Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Guidelines under fire for 'biased' sex courses (D.C.)
The Washington Times ^ | 11-28-07 | Gary Emerling

Posted on 11/28/2007 11:03:32 AM PST by JZelle

Proposed guidelines for sex-education classes in D.C. public schools face opposition from critics who say the standards are biased against abstinence-only education, promote the view that homosexuality is innate and are not age-appropriate.

"I'm quite confident if you surveyed all the public school parents in D.C., the majority would not agree with these standards," said Richard Urban, executive director of Urban Life Training and Reality Assessment (ULTRA) Teen Choice, which promotes abstinence.

Mr. Urban is among those slated to testify tonight at a public hearing before the State Board of Education, which is expected to vote on the standards next month.

The guidelines say eighth-grade students should be taught the definition of sexual orientation "using correct terminology" and learn that some people "may begin to feel romantically and/or sexually attracted to people of a different gender and/or to people of the same gender."

They say sixth-grade students should be taught that "people, regardless of biological sex, gender, ability, sexual orientation, gender identity and culture, have sexual feelings and the need for love, affection and physical intimacy."

Ninth-graders should be taught to "analyze trends in ... contraceptive practices, and the availability of abortion," the guidelines state.

Regina Griggs, executive director of Parents and Friends of Ex-Gays and Gays (PFOX), said her organization is concerned that the term "sexual orientation" in the standards could lead to a curriculum that teaches that homosexuality is innate.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; US: District of Columbia
KEYWORDS: dcschools; homeschool; sexed

1 posted on 11/28/2007 11:03:34 AM PST by JZelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: JZelle

With all of the problems in the D. C. school system, do they really imagine they can make the world safer for gays with their indoctrination? They need to start by convincing students to stop shooting each other.


2 posted on 11/28/2007 11:07:12 AM PST by Spok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JZelle

“I’m quite confident if you surveyed all the public school parents in D.C., the majority would not agree with these standards,”

There’s the problem. The liberal public school systems don’t give a rodent’s butt about what the parents want.

That’s why my daughter is in Christian school.


3 posted on 11/28/2007 11:12:11 AM PST by fredhead (What this world needs is a few more Rednecks - Charlie Daniels)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JZelle

>>The guidelines say eighth-grade students should be taught the definition of sexual orientation “using correct terminology” and learn that some people “may begin to feel romantically and/or sexually attracted to people of a different gender and/or to people of the same gender.”

What!? They left out teaching 13 year-olds about “sexual attraction to animals and toddlers”. How un-progressive of them! How “judgemental”!


4 posted on 11/28/2007 11:13:11 AM PST by vikingd00d
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JZelle
City officials released a report this week saying the number of AIDS cases per 100,000 residents in the District is much higher than the national average and that HIV cases in recent years have increasingly resulted from heterosexual contact

Notice anything missing?

How about the exact number of AIDS cases per 100,000 in the District versus exact number for the national average for both homosexuals and heterosexuals. How about the exact number of heterosexual cases wherein there was contact with infected intravenous drug users.

This article is a perfect example of the lie promoted by surrounding it with a half truth.
5 posted on 11/28/2007 11:52:05 AM PST by Lucky Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vikingd00d

Should queers be taught about contraceptive practices, and the availability of abortion? Isn’t this offensive to them?


6 posted on 11/28/2007 12:32:41 PM PST by B4Ranch (( "Freedom is not free, but don't worry the U.S. Marine Corps will pay most of your share." ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: JZelle

Meanwhile I read where AIDS is running rampant in DC. Any correlation?


7 posted on 11/28/2007 12:58:03 PM PST by vpintheak (Like a muddied spring or a polluted well is a righteous man who gives way to the wicked. Prov. 25:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson