Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: houston1

Thanks.

So... if I understand this correctly, if Lott resigns this year (as he has said he will do), then the election to replace him will be held within 100 days of his resignation, and the appointee would serve until then?

But if he were to leave office early next year, the election to replace him would be November 2008 general election, and the appointee would serve longer?


21 posted on 11/27/2007 4:37:49 PM PST by Nervous Tick (Retire Ron Paul! Support Chris Peden (www.chrispeden.org))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]


To: Nervous Tick

That’s the way I read it, since he wants to be out by the end of the year to avoid the new lobbying restrictions I guess they’ll have to have a special election around Feb., if he waits until 2008 Barbour can appoint a replacement and hold the election in Nov


24 posted on 11/27/2007 4:46:02 PM PST by houston1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

To: Nervous Tick

” if he were to leave office early next year, the election to replace him would be November 2008 general election”

Here’s an interesting twist....

Sen Vacant Lott was interviewed on Supertalk MS Radio this morning. What he said in the interview was that he would serve “until the end of the current session.” If Dingy and the dimwits decide to pull the same stunt thru Christmas as they did thru the Thanksgiving break, then the session will not end until after the first of the year. That could actually ruin Lott’s lobbying plans and the dimwit plans to force a spring election.


49 posted on 11/27/2007 8:37:01 PM PST by NerdDad (Aug 7, 1981, I married my soulmate, CDBEAR. 26 years and I'm still teenager-crazy in love with her.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson