Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: dsc
If so, isn’t it rather hypocritical to castigate him for posting it while defending its legality?

No, common decency, and probably court rules, say you don't post that to a general public forum where people who are not looking for gay porn are going to see it. If I go to www.gaylovers.com (just guessing) I would expect to see that, and I wouldn't allow my kids to go there. If I'm going to www.flsd.uscourts.gov I don't expect to see such photos, and I would normally let my kids go to a site like that for research -- but for the fact that because of Jack Thompson they could be exposed to gay porn.

The strange part is that he thinks he's scored some sort of victory by putting hardcore gay porn on servers paid for by the taxpayers. The gay pornographers themselves aren't even that bad.

And he's done it more than once. He is worse than those he purports to fight against.

40 posted on 11/27/2007 12:48:28 PM PST by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]


To: antiRepublicrat

“No, common decency, and probably court rules, say...”

If common decency says that you shouldn’t post it to a place where some truly ghastly images might be found (photos of murdered people, etc.), then perhaps it shouldn’t be legal. I think that’s probably the guy’s point.


42 posted on 11/27/2007 11:38:47 PM PST by dsc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson