Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: PAR35

OTOH the ATF, in typical fashion, inspected the device before and stated it was not a class III device and its use didn’t turn a firearm into a class III, so Akins went forward with production (at an out-of-pocket expense of 100’s of k$). Then, the ATF turns around and says, yes, it is class III, you don’t have a permit, and all the people you sold it to could now be charged with felonies if they don’t surrender the devices, no compensation. Here’s a case where a “ruling” from the ATF carries the weight of law, even when the ATF contradicts itself. The power to do that is extremely destructive, and any agency with that power needs tight control (e.g. by one or more of the branches of government). Gun owners have gotten no help from the Bush administration, however.


15 posted on 11/26/2007 8:09:46 PM PST by coloradan (Failing to protect the liberties of your enemies establishes precedents that will reach to yourself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: coloradan
Gun owners have gotten no help from the Bush administration, however

All too true - on ANY gun related issues.

23 posted on 11/27/2007 8:31:45 AM PST by from occupied ga (Your most dangerous enemy is your own government, Benito Guilinni a short man in search of a balcony)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: coloradan

My copy of the Constitution doesn’t have a clause in ANY of the Articles that would allow the FedGov to even HAVE an agency like the BATFE.


24 posted on 11/27/2007 9:35:02 AM PST by Dead Corpse (What would a free man do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson