[tanuki]

“Which is why you see the tactics you do today in “debates” on college campuses for people like Horowitz and Coulter. They can’t cogently argue, so they shout down and sometimes physically attack their opposition. Classic Alinsky-socialism-Marxism.”

Yeah, Alinskyism explains a lot of what many of have witnessed. Hopefully, we now have the guts to call the emotional terrorists on their game. The victim card ain’t working real well for Hillary. May she and hers continue in this and other veins of action.

[chimera]

The cult of Alinsky runs like a common thread through the mindset of modern-era Lenins like Hillary and Obama. Hillary is a dyed-in-the-wool 1960s radical. She's tried to gussy it up a bit with a faux dash of "centrism" and "triangulation" (which is exactly what Alinsky preaches they should do to make their radical core more palatable to "the masses" as well as well-heeled and connected useful idiots).

Obama is more the post-1960s radical whose approach is more Fabian socialism. For that reason, he could be the more dangerous of the two in terms of presenting a "pretty picture" and seeming more charming and acceptable and approachable than the more dogmatic and ruthless Hillary. But then again, Hillary may destroy him before he gets too far.