Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: highball
You challenged that the state has the right to mandate that the suing party in a no-fault divorce must give up custody. The state's police power gives it that. You miss the point. You called it "liberal nonsense".

It was, actually. I amend the question, which you dodged (an oversight, I'm sure).

Did you read my post? I answered your question.

The same way you get any law changed.

Too many interests involved in this divorce industry. You hadn't figured that out? Waiting for you to tell me how to overcome them.

284 posted on 11/29/2007 7:13:20 AM PST by William Terrell (Individuals can exist without government but government can't exist without individuals.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 271 | View Replies ]


To: William Terrell
"The same way you get any law changed."

Too many interests involved in this divorce industry.

Ah, so I was right.

You want to use the force of the state to settle a political argument you think you can't win.

Not a conservative position.

286 posted on 11/29/2007 10:03:03 AM PST by highball ("I never should have switched from scotch to martinis." -- the last words of Humphrey Bogart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 284 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson