Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: William Terrell

It’s simply a pendulum swung to far on a good idea. And yes, you do sound like someone who got bitch-slapped in a NFD.

I remember the ‘bad’ ole days before NFD, when bad things were ignored because folks knew they could get away with it. The. ‘shame’ of divorce was too great. When lots of nasty things got swept under the rug to keep up appearances. No one wanted to go through an ugly public, name calling divorce.

My father got custody of my half-sister in his divorce— because he had that much clout, and his first wife just didn’t want to go through the hell the man could dish out.

My Mom didn’t divorce him because she really believed he’d get custody of all of us. His first divorce was legend.

So yeah, maybe 50 years ago, divorce was more on the mans side, maybe now it’s more on the womans.

The goal should be to just make it fair and civil for all sides.

Anyhow, the premise is good and I’d hate to see it go back to the horror it was before.


191 posted on 11/26/2007 1:38:05 PM PST by najida ("Will you dance at my birthday party?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 186 | View Replies ]


To: najida
Make you case that women are not the winners in a no-fault divorce, and don't have the greatest interest in it continuance.

216 posted on 11/26/2007 2:14:53 PM PST by William Terrell (Individuals can exist without government but government can't exist without individuals.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 191 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson