Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: William Terrell
How, specifically, and actually?

I would not get rid of NFD however I would make increase the separation period needed to obtain it. In some states six months separation or less is required for a unilateral NFD, and I do believe that people should have more time to consider what they really want.

I think that parents who seek a divorce should be required to take a class on the impact of divorce both on their finances and their children.

Mediation, where the spouses (no lawyers) sit with a mediator and try to work out a suitable parenting agreement, should be required. I think that joint custody should be strongly encouraged, if not a presumption.

I think that parties that seek to use the children as pawns by denying visitation or making false accusations should be punished by losing custody.

Above all, we have to realise that divorce is as much a moral question as a legal one and that the legal system is not a fairy godmother who can make everything right again. If people, both men and women, remembered that every people you have sex with could be the mother or father of your child, I think 90% of these problems would go away.

164 posted on 11/26/2007 1:07:53 PM PST by LWalk18
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies ]


To: LWalk18
Yes, but how would you remove the no-fault ground from a state's list of divorcable causes? If you just want to make it harder, why not go all the way and use the author's strategy?

176 posted on 11/26/2007 1:21:43 PM PST by William Terrell (Individuals can exist without government but government can't exist without individuals.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies ]

To: LWalk18
I would not get rid of NFD however I would make increase the separation period needed to obtain it. In some states six months separation or less is required for a unilateral NFD, and I do believe that people should have more time to consider what they really want.

I think we should stop trying to parent adults, myself.

I think that parents who seek a divorce should be required to take a class on the impact of divorce both on their finances and their children. Mediation, where the spouses (no lawyers) sit with a mediator and try to work out a suitable parenting agreement, should be required. I think that joint custody should be strongly encouraged, if not a presumption.

You've just proposed two more suggestions that would only get in the way of mature people making their own decisions and inject some other person who has no business being there. My parents are probably the model of divorce. They worked it out without any court-mandated arrangement. The minute you start mandating these counselors and mediators, you're injecting people with likely degrees from liberal arts colleges whose motives may not best serve your situation.

Do I think people act selfishly, vindictively and sometimes just stupid in divorce? Absolutely. Do I think a more controlling court system will change that? No. I think people being stupid is one of those side effects of being free. Free people do have the freedom to really make a mess of things. Makes it all the more admirable when we make a success of it.

I think that parties that seek to use the children as pawns by denying visitation or making false accusations should be punished by losing custody.

I think they should be publicly flogged. Are you OK with that?

Above all, we have to realise that divorce is as much a moral question as a legal one and that the legal system is not a fairy godmother who can make everything right again.

Best part of your post. This is the sentence I most wanted to respond and agree with!

183 posted on 11/26/2007 1:26:40 PM PST by HairOfTheDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson