Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: doug from upland
there seems to be some risk with this filing.

If The Supremes of California rule the conduct is not criminal, does that potentially kill the “smoking gun” tape from being used in his suit v. Bill Clinton ?

You can’t unring the bell...and the Clintons will move for immediate dismissal. Could this be in the appeals process a long time before it ever sees the court room ?

11 posted on 11/26/2007 8:55:44 AM PST by stylin19a
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: stylin19a

His counsel will have to answer those questions. As I understand it, they are being asked to rule whether the alleged conduct is sufficient to remove the anti-SLAPP protection. It should not affect the case against Bill in which she is a material witness. The Ca Supr Ct already ruled a few years ago against Bill, and he goes to trial. If the appeals process looks as if it will be too lengthy, Peter can give up the appeal against Hillary and proceed to discovery. Discovery is the key. What she has done will finally be on the record for all to see.


14 posted on 11/26/2007 9:12:25 AM PST by doug from upland (StoppingCl Hillary should be a FreeRepublic Manhattan Project)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson