[Tarpon]

The Democrats are caught between bad and bad options. On one hand, the SC blows away their collective nonsense, on the other hand the SC upholds their collective nonsense and the electorate blows away the Democrats. Take your pick, no good options.

If the SC goes collective, it will be time to fix the problem with another Constitutional Amendment. The debate will be full throated, even if Hillary Matters doesn't participate. In any event, what’s a Democrat to do.

Same with illegal immigration AMNESTY voters, Democrats are screwed. Hillary Matters seems to want to convince people she doesn't talk straight, maybe calling her campaign "the double talk express" would be to her liking?

The list keeps growing and Iraq is not going to be at the top of the list.

[Pistolshot]

Actually, if the SCOTUS goes 'collective', we won't be deciding anything at the 'ballot' box, but we will settle it with the 'cartridge' box.

That is what the Bill of Rights was designed for, to limit government from abusing it's citizens, and restore governement to the people if necessary.

[patton]

What would the ammendment say, “...and we mean it this time?”

[tcostell]

Excellent analysis, but you leave off the option that the SCOTUS backs away from collectivism, AND the Dems get blasted in the polls anyway. In my view, this election is going to be the mainstream media and the Democrats against talk radio and the publicly stated will of the people on immigration, guns and taxes.

We might not win control of the legislature, but it very much looks like we're going to win on the issues.