The comment ‘not electable’ doesn’t apply when people have not said what a bad leader Hunter is with what his record is and how he gives interviews, speeches, what he says. There are the comments from people who watch him ‘I like this guy’, ‘impressive’. Sorry, but you really don’t hear that about Fred from most people. It’s more that the candidates are largely lib-’moderates’ and they only flock to Fred in desperation to keep them from the nomination rather than thinking he’s the best.
I have read so much unsubstaniated drivel from you on this thread, but this takes the cake. We consistently see positive comments on Fred's positions and "performance" from across the spectrum that for you to say that you "don't hear that about Fred" tells me you are either terribly misinformed or just making stuff up as you go.
You can have your guy, but your unfounded assertions about FDTs electability are way beyond the pale. This idea of tearing others down because you can't build your guy up is counter-productive and childish.
If you don't want Fred, don't vote for him. Point out some policy problems if you wish. But your stated reasons for voting against him in this thread are as vapid and silly as what I would expect from a teenager.
I'm sorry you don't think he is pretty enough to be President. I happen to like his policies, and I think grown-ups of both parties would like to vote for someone who tackles issues head on and doesn't mince words.
But if you find thoughtful answers boring, then I guess you will get what you deserve, and if the electorate at large feels the same way, it doesn't matter who wins, does it?