I know what it said. The term "attacking" is rather subjective though, isn't it?
While I am directly opposed to Fred and have argued against him at times, I have largely left him alone in deference to the other half of the forum that do support him. I have mainly argued for Conservatism with an admitted tilt toward Hunter.
But I will speak my mind when I choose, and would prefer to do that without such a scurrilous charge hanging over my head.
To fabricate such an accusation does little other than attempt to pull the teeth of your opposition, especially so as the debate is boiled down into the two obvious camps that are now forming and will likely remain until the bitter end.
It is wrong for a conservative to attack a conservative in a primary when the objective is to have the nominee be a conservative.