Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: b9

Ani DeFranco came up with the idea over a decade ago.
It’s getting a lot more common to cut out the “labels”.
I think Radiohead did something really cool very recently - - they offered their latest CD by on-line downloading ONLY. Essentially for FREE.


4 posted on 11/25/2007 1:33:51 AM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Lancey Howard
The recent Radiohead album reportedly made the band more money than all their previous albums despite the fact that most people (including a band member) downloaded it for free - which is a sad statement on the recording industry.

Radiohead essentially put their album online for free but allowed downloaders to "set their own price." The result was that many downloaders paid at least a couple of dollars, which was more than what any record label would have paid them had they been selling copies for $15.98 at some shopping mall record store.

Some downloaders paid as much as $100 (obviously well-off fans who wanted to encourage the process).

As for those who paid nothing, the band has an opportunity to win more fans, especially since traditional radio isn't playing it (they are still too busy playing "flavor of the moment" acts like Timbaland, Britney Spears and Beyonce).

Performing artists offering their music directly to the fans is the wave of the future. That said, I'm dubious about the Eagles decision to market their music through Wal-Mart. No serious music fan goes to Wal-Mart to buy music.

13 posted on 11/25/2007 2:25:50 AM PST by SamAdams76 (I am 2 days away from outliving Freddie Mercury)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson