Posted on 11/24/2007 9:43:27 PM PST by krogers58
important article ping
“The democrat leadership and their activist base are traitors pure and simple.”
Yes... and we need to try thousands for treason and sedition and build many, many gallows to carry out their sentences!
LLS
There is plenty of political healing going on over there... but like our vast MILITARY VICTORIES... the msm lies and refuses to report the truth about it. This too will become impossible for them to do... IRAQ is WON!
LLS
They laughed at Jesus too.
LLS
Amen brother!!!
LLS
Thanks for the ping.
Oops. Thanks should have been to you. Merci beaucoup!
Thanks for the ping-
I am getting so tired of words : (
I want action : )
YW and mega dittos to these comments. Waaaaaaay past time.
Thanks for the ping.
Yes, the irony is that after they’ve stabbed the nation and her troops in the back like Brutus and the boys going after Julius Caesar, they will most assuredly NOT get accused osf stabbing us in the back. Why? Because we’re going to win, and instead of being blamed for our loss they will be mocked for their stupidity.
What I’m interested in is where all the Freepers who’ve been in with the Dems from the beginning are. Not even the Paulestinians talk about the quagmire in Iraq any more.
Were you saying this same sort of stuff about military progress 6 months or 9 months ago? Do you actually trust the media to report accurately on political developments over there, or will they use the same lens they used when it came to reporting the military and hearts-and-minds aspects?
All weve shown so far is that we can force em to occasionally behave in a slightly more civilized manner if we lean on em hard enough.
No, we've shown that at the town and province level they don't need to be leaned on at all. Your picture of Iraq is so out of date it predates Petraeus.
Old Paul Harvey has said something about the Middle Eastern Muslims being unready for, and incapable of, understanding and maintaining fair elections and representative government. I agree with Paul.
Paul Harvey is qualified to judge the success of counter-insurgency strategies in the same way I'm qualified to be the starting quarterback for the Green Bay Packers. In other words, not at all.
Agree with the approach, but I don't think there's any way we're getting the Senate back this cycle. Too many open seats in blue or purple states. However, I think there is very little chance that the Dems will hold the House, especially if they're still the do-nothing 20% approval rating Congress next fall...and I think that's very, very likely. Plus, if we have a House landslide and the White House stays GOP, the momentum from that will keep the Senate from going deep blue. That means we'll still have a Senate where you can't get anything done unless you can convince 10 or 12 Republicans to go along with you. Sweet, sweet gridlock!
One and a half branches firmly in GOP hands and a GOP president appointing at least the next two Supreme Court vacancies...that's enough for me this cycle.
Those guys are the real dead-enders.
And though he won't point to her and say "Traitor" the GOP nominee will use this against Hillary. When national security comes up, he'll be able to ask "Do we really want a commander-in-chief so clueless she thought the surge wouldn't work? Someone who said that the idea that our troops could win required 'willing suspension of disbelief'"?
Great minds think alike. See post 58.
I think Bush will be regarded as a great or very good President someday. I also think that Petraeus’ name will be breathed in the same breath as Patton and Sherman someday.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.