Posted on 11/24/2007 1:24:22 PM PST by West Coast Conservative
Last month, during a Republican debate, Ron Paul was asked whether he promised to support the GOP nominee next year, no matter who emerges from the primary process. “Not right now I don’t,” Paul said, “not unless they’re willing to end the war and bring our troops home.”
Apparently, in the ensuing weeks, “not right now” has become “no.”
Paul called his Republican presidential rivals, including frontrunner Rudy Giuliani, “neo-conservatives” whom he couldn’t support in the general election should his own bid fail.
“They think we’re supposed to spread our goodness through force,” Paul said. For example, none will pledge not to wage war on Iran, he said. “How could I support something like that?”
Apparently, he can’t. But it means that of the top seven candidates in the Republican field, Paul is the only one who isn’t prepared to support the party’s eventual nominee. It’s not the kind of thing that will go over well within the party, but then again, Paul’s interest in the Republican Party appears nominal — it’s a venue for him to advance his ideas and agenda, not necessarily an opportunity for him to lead the party.
It’s interesting to note the contrast between Paul’s comments and John Edwards’. A couple of weeks ago, Edwards hedged when asked if he would support the eventual Democratic nominee, no matter who it is. When he initially hesitated, it caused a minor stir in Democratic circles — how can Edwards expect to be the party’s nominee if he’s not willing to commit to honoring the party’s nominating process?
No one seems to be saying that about Paul, in large part because no one seems to consider Paul part of the Republican mainstream.
For that matter, it also once again raises the specter of an independent Paul bid.
During an MSNBC interview earlier this month, Norah O’Donnell followed up on this point:
O’DONNELL: Congressman, as you know, most of the other Republicans running for president that you have stood onstage with during the debates, they support a continuation of the war in Iraq. You want to end the war in Iraq. If one of them is awarded the Republican nomination, will you choose a third party? Will you not back that nominee?
PAUL: No, I don’t plan to run in a third party. That’s not my goal. But if we have a candidate that loves the war and loves the neo-con position of promoting our–
At that point in the interview, O’Donnell interrupted, and the interview didn’t return to the subject. But the “I don’t plan to run” language, coupled by this week’s remarks about not supporting the eventual GOP nominee, should continue to raise eyebrows when it comes to Paul’s intentions.
“NO! I didn’t get the nomination so I’m taking my toys and going home!”
ROFLMAO!!!
He’s sounding more and more shrill.
Edwards.
Paul is just a shill of the left wing
Should I take this comment by Paul to be an acknowledgment that whoever the nominee is going to be, it is not going to be him?
Twisted wreck....
Why was he ever driven to be a Republican?
We must surrender before we win!
Whatever credibility he once had is gone.
Please tell me oh non-shrill one, would you support Ron Paul it was the GOP nominee?
“Whatever credibility he once had is gone.”
He can’t lose what he never had.
Not a big deal. 95%+ of his “supporters” are leftists who see eye to eye with his surrender stance on the WOT and his 9/11 conspiracy lunacy. ...and they’ll be voting for the Dem nominee anyway. His libertarian, small gov’t supporters are a negligible few. ...and they rarely vote Republican.
More to the point—why were Republicans ever driven to vote for this fringe ideologue? vaudine
It just appears that way because he is just as nutty as they are.
“would you support Ron Paul it was the GOP nominee?”
HELL NO!
He is an egotistical moron.
We would be speaking German today if this nut had been in charge in the 1940’s.
Some things are worth fighting for Ron. Sitting around listening to Willie Nelson, smoking dope, and hoping to be left alone; isn’t what made this nation great.
Ron Paul is a disease that must be vaccinated against.
I can only surmise that it's because they aren't Republicans in the first place.
After all, in the blue state of Minnesota, Ron Paul wiped out ALL the other candidates in a "straw poll" and Minnesota certainly isn't considered a conservative state.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.