Posted on 11/24/2007 6:15:30 AM PST by bannie
Its five strands of diamonds covered her decolletage and made the Queen's jewels look quite modest as they attended the Queen's banquet for the Commonwealth Heads of Government in Kampala, Uganda, on Friday.
But Camilla didn't deliberately set out to overshadow her mother-in-law - the Queen gave her permission to borrow it from the royal collection.
Camilla's favourite couturier, Anna Valentine, designed her a simple duck-egg blue dress and matching stole to set off the necklace, estimated to be worth tens of millions of dollars.
The Duchess added the Queen Mother's Boucheron tiara, a set of diamond earrings and the Queen Elizabeth II Family Order, given to female members of the royal family.
...
(Excerpt) Read more at news.com.au ...
Now that you mention it.... ;)
Um, the bling is simply over the top. You would be hard pressed to put that on anyone and it look good. It is just in your face wealth. No grace. No elegance. All of which were her choices. Those choices are fair game to comment on.
Congratulations!
You’re a much better person than I am.
Enjoy yourself!
Maybe the photographer got the angle just a few degrees off and that's why the golden disk is not centered behind her head so as to give her a religious icon look. The angle elongated the look into a Papal hat effect which I think was not the intent.
I suspect the intent was to further the BS mythology put forth in Holy Blood, Holy Grail and followed up on by Dan Brown in his movie.
IOW they seem to think we're going to buy the crap that current royalty is descended from Christ, thereby reawakening the divine right of kings Bull Hockey.
Sorry, Cammie, no sale and you are not equipped in any category to promote it. Neither is the Trouser Tampon.
BTW, Angela, I happen to agree with you. This woman is in her 50s, and looks it.
So does most everybody in the world unless wealthy enough to go under the knife.
They were wrong to cheat on their spouses, though, and I suppose that fact has a great deal to do with the anger directed at her here. That is the bed they made for themselves. It is hard to be sympathetic to people who have broken vows so flagrantly.
Regards,
Camilla was the catalyst for Di & Charles ruinous marriage, pure & simple.
Inbreeding.
That’s the reason they brought in Di. As a brood mare. Fluff up the gene pool.
I still have not understood the purpose, value or the public’s facination with those people.
Could be...after all, everybody knows that the wearing of red snippets of cloth indicate that you CARE.
Regards,
PS: Remember that Seinfeld where Kramer wouldn’t wear the red AIDS ribbon while marching in the AIDS walk? “Why do I have to wear that thing? I’m walking in the walk! Doesn’t that mean I care?”
Check out her wedding picture: http://www.cnn.com/interactive/world/0504/gallery.royal.wedding/02.01.charles.camilla.ap.jpg
My, she has certainly aged in just a few short years. Either that, or she had some botox injections just before the big day.
(By the way, how can I post pictures on FR?)
Camilla is the one Charles always wanted. Diana was the virgin he had to marry to make “an heir and a spare” to placate the proles.
And Diana went along with it so she’s not the saint people want to paint her to be.
It’s ironic when Kramer is the voice of sanity!!!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.