“Unfortunately, the two BP agents on the scene were unable to aprehend the single unarmed man,”
There is no evidence that he was unarmed. He got away before anyone could tell. Ramos saw him point something silver at him (Ramos), which is what caused Ramos to fire.
Again I will ask, if Davila was injured so badly, why was he able to get away without being slowed down, without anyone noticing any limp and without any blood on the ground? Or do you think the pain and bleeding somehow started after he got away?
Here is evidence he was unarmed:
1) Nobody reported a gun until they were arrested.
2) No shots were fired
3) No gun was found at the scene
4) No record of a gun purchase was presented
5) Neither BP agent would testify that he had a gun, only that they thought they saw one.
Two police officers were sure they saw a gun, and shot Dialo to death in New York. It was his wallet. An LEO saying he thought he saw a gun is meaningless in determining if there actually was a gun.
So you are incorrect to say there is no evidence he was unarmed. On the contrary, there is no physical evidence that he was armed.
On the other hand, we know he was shot at more than 10 times. So if he had a gun, he showed pretty good restraint not actually shooting back.