[Vince Ferrer]

This is not really new, and in fact there is an organization called the The Voluntary Human Extinction Movement

Unfortunately, Toni's child was not given a choice in this matter, but as long as it is voluntary, in general I have no problem with this movement, even if I disagree with its premise. Of course, the first thing they will compromise on eventually is the word "voluntary."

[DB]

This is what I posted on an earlier thread about her:

What?

You mean it was morally wrong to kill an innocent child she created through her recklessness because it would be a “burden” to the world?

That when she was faced with the choice of killing herself or someone else as to not be a burden on the world that she chose someone else to die?

And all along she says she’s not selfish?

This is where adolescent leftest thought gets you. Living a total contradiction, unable to see it and the results being dead people - all with the “best” intentions...

[atomic conspiracy]

"Of course, the first thing they will compromise on eventually is the word 'voluntary.'"

Absolutely. Eco-icon Paul Ehrlich (author of The Population Bomb(1968) and its assorted sequels) advocated the forcible sterilization of men in India and many other draconian measures, including genocide by neglect, to deal with what he saw as an approaching catastrophe.

He also predicted that pesticide use would reduce US life expectancy to 42 by 1980, there would be food-rationing here by the 90s, and we would be out of oil long before either of these.