8mm
Posted on 11/23/2007 8:51:24 AM PST by wagglebee
NEW YORK, November 22, 2007 (C-FAM.ORG)- At a United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) lecture at the UN on Tuesday, Dr. Gertrude Mongella, president of the Pan-African Parliament and former top UN official, praised UNFPA’s controversial promotion of “reproductive rights,” a term used by some UN committees to mean abortion, as a way to reduce the tragedy of maternal mortality even while admitting that the policy has failed to help women.
Mongella, a former UN under-secretary and special envoy on women’s issues and development, reported that the number of women dying from maternal causes in Africa had remained virtually unchanged from 1990 to 2005 and that in some parts of Africa, the maternal mortality rate continues to rise. She said that anywhere from 10-30% of this was due to unsafe abortions.
In fact, the World Heath Organization (WHO) stated recently that virtually no data exists to make such a claim since most developing countries do not report the cause of death or the sex of the deceased. Nonetheless, Mongella pledged to continue quoting that statistic “until the world listens to save the lives of those women.”
Despite the failure of UN agencies to reduce maternal deaths, Mongella praised UNFPA, saying that before UNFPA began promoting reproductive rights, “reproduction was some kind of enslavement” that “chained” women. She went on to credit UNFPA for helping develop “language” surrounding reproductive rights and population and development despite religious and cultural resistance, especially on the issue of abortion.
Mongella indicated that the reason UNFPA’s reproductive rights approach has failed is a lack of national commitment, support, poor coordination, inadequate male involvement, and particularly the low status of women and women’s lack of decision-making power. She then called for more advocacy and NGO involvement, stating, “Women’s rights are human rights and reproductive health is part of women’s rights.”
The way forward, she said, is to train women to “demand maternal health as a right” and set up human rights mechanisms within the UN where countries could be held accountable for their lack of progress.
Conservative UN experts argue that UNFPA has failed because it is radically out of step with the consensus of the medical community, among other things.
A recently released paper by Dr. Susan Yoshihara, notes that health care professionals agree that skilled birth attendants, emergency obstetrics and decent health care are what reduces maternal mortality and that countries that restrict abortion, such as Ireland and Honduras, have reduced their maternal mortality.
Other problems with UNFPA’s “abortion first” agenda, Yoshihara argues, is that it seeks to divert funds from HIV/AIDs and other epidemics in need of attention to the already well funded UN family planning program, relies on unreliable and unsubstantiated data, promotes dangerous abortion practices that jeopardize women’s lives, and targets religion, culture and the families that UNFPA views as barriers to the success of UNFPA’s reproductive rights agenda.
Quit, evict them from the United States and auction off their building (which we paid for) to the highest bidder.
Human rights mechanisms???
Doesn't she mean "Free ATM's"?
We don't have to evict them. If we did they'd just go somewhere else and make trouble.
It would be better to resign from the UN but let them stay and revoke their diplomatic immunity. Most of those people owe New York City so many parking tickets they'd all be in jail in within a week.
So, lets, put her opinion straight, in its clear meaning as to what she is saying the problem is NOT:
Its not young women who protect their maternity, allowing it to not be risked, except for men they chose and who have chosen them in a commitment of marriage.
Its not young men who make promises they have no intention of keeping to the women to whom they make them.
Its not the self-induced additional poverty that pregnancy out-of-wedlock creates or the self-induced additional health risks that that additional poverty creates.
No, all those things can be experienced by a young woman and they should not affect her life adversely - because regardless of the fact they are all pretty much and most often self-induced, she can have the infant killed in her womb and thereby render the punishment for her errors on that infant, not herself.
Freep-mail me to get on or off my pro-life and Catholic Ping List:
Please ping me to all note-worthy Pro-Life or Catholic threads, or other threads of interest.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.