Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: basil

Nobody with any sense wanted to impeach Clinton because he had oral sex with an intern. Most Presidents would have quit in shame, but that was not an impeachable offense. Committing perjury in a federal sexual harassment case was an impeachable offense for the guy who is under oath to enforce the law. Not to mention the obstruction of justice.


32 posted on 11/23/2007 4:34:40 PM PST by Defiant ("Expectorate" has Specter in it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]


To: Defiant

Bingo on that. One of the first signs of a Clintonite is arguing that it was “all about sex”, when the real issue is as you outline. The next sign is going ballistic and then silent when confronted with your facts, and the fact that he was disbarred for his perjury (thus proving the seriousness of the event).


34 posted on 11/23/2007 4:38:49 PM PST by FreedomPoster (Guns themselves are fairly robust; their chief enemies are rust and politicians) (NRA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

To: Defiant
Of course you are correct--he was impeached for lying under oath.

However, in today's workplace at least, I think his little deal with Monica would be considered against the law. Maybe not the age difference, because she was apparently only to happy to service him---but the boss/employee thing might apply.

Whatever, I'm still thrilled that he will ever be the "Impeached POTUS"---LOL!

36 posted on 11/23/2007 5:35:02 PM PST by basil (Support the Second Amendment--buy another gun today!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson