Is it the case that the group we're talking about consists of Thompson, Hunter, Paul, and Huckabee?
Of all the pro-gun candidates, how would you rank their standings (as a percent of primary vote total)? For clarity, include the anti-gunners.
I would expect the MSM to support Rudy because he is a RINO whose policies would be indistinguishable from Hillary Clinton or Arnold Schwarzenegger. That makes it difficult to assess how the campaign is really going.
Those who complain that Thompson "lacks the fire in the belly" or isn't campainging "hard enough" seem to miss the fact that Thompson has pretty clearly stated his policies in various statements. You don't have to guess about his pro-gun stance since he has stated it very clearly.
“In the 33 votes it counts, the group said Thompson was on the wrong side of gun rights, including supporting laws allowing minor offenses to cost people the right to own a gun and...”
************
Is this true? Minor offenses, like a speeding ticket, will remove your right to own a gun?
No. The top three I was talking about, and the only ones with a snowballs chance in hell of winning the nomination.
Fred, Rooty, and Romney. Only Fred is pro gun and always has been.
Of all those running on the Republican side that I would say are firmly and dependably pro gun....
Hunter, Fred, Huck, Tanc.
Even Paul has some Really oddball gun votes that were real anti gun votes, not BS from the GOA.
McCain can’t be trusted and Rooty and Mutt are barking moonbat rabid anti gun.
Of the pro gun candidates only one is electable and has a good shot at the nomination.