I think there is a good chance of the NRA backing Fred.
>>>>> ... Gun Owners of America spokesman Erich Pratt
IIRC, Pratt is that spokesman who can't debate his way out of a paperbag. The GOA should back Fred too, but the Huckster seems to be more to their liking.
Clearly Fred Thompson is the choice of 2nd amendment advocates, McCain wanted to end Gunshows, Jooles is a out and out gun grabber and Mitt is a mixed bag.
He did sign the extension of the so called “Assault Weapons” ban in MA, but existing firearms owners had their CCW’s term expanded, and MA became a “Must Issue” state as well.
No such baggage with Fred, the GOA is speaking about the Clnton Dole anti terrorism act, and the restriction was nonsensical “A young teen must have an adult around if they are using a firearm (I think it was only Assault Weapons and pistols).
The Domestic Violence Act was much worse, and IMO UnConstitutional depravation of Civil Rights via ANY domestic violence related conviction even retroactively..
The Second Amendment serves as the anchor by which all other rights are ultimately guaranteed. Neither Romney nor Giuliani ever understood that fact. The Democrats, meanwhile, understand it only too well - which is why they’re absolutely set on eliminating Second Amendment rights.
Ping
I hope so
"Wasn't as staunchly pro-gun"? Didn't Kerry make a special trip back to Washington to join Shumer, Feinstein, Kennedy, and others to vote against gun rights? I can't remember the specific issue; was it an attempt to re-new the so-called "assault weapons" ban?
The author of this article reveals his bias, causing me to dismiss his assessment of Thompson altogether.
Also, can somebody summarize who Pratt supports for this upcoming election. Thompson's stand on the Second seems pretty strong to me.
Another excellent move by Thompson - SC is his if he plays it right.
Endorsing a candidate in a general election has the foreseeable result of aiding the preferred candidate at the expense of the other.
I can see that endorsing one candidate in a primary might have the effect of shifting votes from some other pro-gun candidate with the possible result of having a third, anti-gun candidate barely out-poll all of the pro-gun candidates.
For example, if FDT, hypothetically has broader appeal with the whole electorate than, say, Hunter, then it might make sense to promote FDT. But if Hunter has the broader appeal, then he might be the best candidate to support.
The point is that the best candidate based on just gun rights might not result in the best outcome for gun rights.
If I though Julie-Annie would support my gun rights, especially by selecting pro-gun Supreme Court justices, I would be for him despite his other nonsense. But he is so obviously a hypocrite on this important issue that I could never vote for him. I'll stay home that day cleaning guns and watching the Republican party elect Hillary.
Wish somebody wouldvaskvRudy—Hillary—Obama about the Supremesvupcoming DCvcase
Jan. 3 -- Iowa Jan. 5 -- Wyoming Jan. 8 -- New Hampshire Jan. 15 -- Michigan Jan. 19 -- Nevada / South Carolina Jan. 29 -- Florida Feb. 5 -- Alabama Primary Alaska District Conventions Arkansas Primary California Primary Colorado Precinct Caucuses Connecticut Primary Georgia Primary Illinois Primary Montana Caucus Minnesota Precinct Caucuses / non-binding straw poll New Jersey Primary New York Primary Oklahoma Primary Tennessee Primary Utah Primary West Virginia State Presidential Convention Feb. 5 -- Tentative schedule Delaware Party-run Primary Missouri Primary North Dakota Caucus Arizona PrimaryClick
The way the cycle is stacked this time I don't see much chance of a low tier candidate moving up as there isn't time for money to influx his campaign much less the time needed to set up state organizations and buy ads. So it may well be a three person race as predicted in the national polls but not a guarantee.
Still, I am hopeful for an NRA endorsement for Fred and, if they are going to do it, it can’t come too soon.
Whatever happened to the talk that Senator Graham would have a serious intraparty rival in 2008. Sounds like it must have been cheap talk after all