Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: secretagent
Seeing as many of us at FR had assumed that an officer had a legal requirement to announce an arrest prior to issuing an order to comply, perhaps this mistaken notion was also held by the arrestee.

See my post #102. As I read Utah Code, the officer is required to inform the detainee of his imminent arrest.

111 posted on 11/22/2007 10:32:34 PM PST by FreedomCalls (Texas: "We close at five.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies ]


To: FreedomCalls

It’s be interesting to see the case law construing that section. The way I read it, it says the announcement must be made in the course of arresting him, not PRIOR to arresting him. It also has several exceptions, including one that could be argued to apply here.


118 posted on 11/22/2007 10:48:54 PM PST by ArmstedFragg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies ]

To: FreedomCalls

Your post 102 is similar to other States codes for custodial arrest. The way it is implemented by departments may vary, but it allows for issuing preparatory commands for officer safety, such as, “Turn around and put your hands behind your back.” then applying the cuffs, and saying “You’re under arrest for _______.”


138 posted on 11/23/2007 5:39:40 AM PST by 5Madman2 (There is no such thing as an experienced suicide bomber)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson