A vote is a vote. i find it hard to believe that you would protest these same people voting for your preferred candidate.
Nice try though.
You deliberately confuse the issues. Ron Paul can't control who votes for him, any more than he can control who supports him.
He can, however, reject support from the truther community, as well as hate groups. It's simple to do, all candidates do it.
IMO the truther ideology, that's the topic here, is essentially un-American, in most forms suggesting the worst forms of criminal behaivior on the part of our public officials.
I'll be the first to support GWB's impeachment, or criminal charges for anyone involved in the conspiracy, if truther charges are proven true, but till then they're just a bunch of anarchist nutballs.
Paul should be willing to denounce their ideology, required only because he continually seeks their votes, rather he suggests that it's a good thing Dems are in power, and maybe another 9/11 investigation would be a good idea.
Of course he thinks GWB should be impeached, so at least he's consistant on that point.
He panders to the worst impulses of society for vote.
"I would have trouble arguing that he's [GWB]been a Constitutional President and once you violate the Constitution and be proven to do that I think these people should be removed from office."
BTW, if you care to provide examples of the other Republican candidates slumming for votes like Paul does, be my guest.