[Smokin' Joe]

You can see animal trails on aerial photos, we used to use them scouting deer trails before deer season--it saved a lot of time on the ground.

Any well developed or well-used path will show up as well, and this is the basis for the adverse posession claim.

In short, evidence, pro or con.

It has one hell of a lot more than 'jack squat' to do with it if the claimed 18 years of use don't show up until a year or so ago, it means the litigants trying to claim adverse posession are lying.

That is not "adverse posession", it is theft.

Of course, with the condition of the courts today, I can see why pertinent, even crucial evidence might not have "Jack squat" to do with the decision handed down.

YMMV.

[pray4liberty]

Facts don't matter to the legal brahmins when they can use the system to take from you whatever they want--and have their friends help them get away with it.

Hope those Boulder high-society hostesses refuse to invite these two cretins to their parties. I sure wouldn't, without making sure my fur coats were locked in the closet upstairs, the Renoir in the living room has a hidden tracking device embedded on it and the silver was under lock and key!