To: blam
I find it interesting that they don’t dispute the fact that there was a flood. But like every other secular “scientific” organization or publication they discount the possibility that it was caused by divine intervention in mankind’s history. The y thus break with science in that they do not explore every possible cause.
7 posted on
11/21/2007 2:25:32 PM PST by
P8riot
(I carry a gun because I can't carry a cop.)
To: P8riot
no, what they are doing is useful. This is just one piece of the puzzle.
9 posted on
11/21/2007 2:30:00 PM PST by
ari-freedom
(Scientific consensus is formed by the public schools and government grants.)
To: P8riot
But like every other secular scientific organization or publication they discount the possibility that it was caused by divine intervention in mankinds history.
Uh thats because science requires a logical, verifiable answer. Saying " and then a miracle happened" is by definition NOT science, it's religion.
78 posted on
11/22/2007 1:37:06 AM PST by
Kozak
(Anti Shahada: There is no god named Allah, and Muhammed is a false prophet)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson