Skip to comments.
Presidential primary can go forward in Michigan, state Supreme Court rules
International Herald Tribude ^
| 11-21-7
| AP
Posted on 11/21/2007 12:55:24 PM PST by Petronski
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-64 next last
This should move the New Hampshire date too.
1
posted on
11/21/2007 12:55:26 PM PST
by
Petronski
To: Beagle8U; SE Mom; jellybean; Politicalmom; Reagan Man
Ping for analysis of implications.
2
posted on
11/21/2007 12:57:13 PM PST
by
Petronski
(Reject the liberal troika: romney, giuliani, mccain)
To: Petronski
Thanks for posting this.
As I said on the other thread...This is bad news for Romney.
3
posted on
11/21/2007 12:59:55 PM PST
by
Beagle8U
(FreeRepublic -- One stop shopping ....... Its the Conservative Super WalMart for news .)
To: Petronski
It is good news for Romney I believe, someone correct me here if I am wrong.
4
posted on
11/21/2007 1:02:37 PM PST
by
jveritas
(God bless our brave troops and President Bush)
To: jveritas
5
posted on
11/21/2007 1:03:18 PM PST
by
Beagle8U
(FreeRepublic -- One stop shopping ....... Its the Conservative Super WalMart for news .)
To: Beagle8U
I thought it is the opposite, since Romney is ahead in Iowa, New Hampshire and Michigan. Carrying 3 states before going to South Carolina primaries can have a huge impact.
6
posted on
11/21/2007 1:04:14 PM PST
by
jveritas
(God bless our brave troops and President Bush)
To: Petronski
Michigan retards.
Moving up the primaries WILL NOT regain Michigan’s relevancy.
Every time I want to go home to Michigan, these morons do something else like raise taxes.
7
posted on
11/21/2007 1:05:18 PM PST
by
SJSAMPLE
To: jveritas

I think 2nd is ok especially if it's close.
8
posted on
11/21/2007 1:08:07 PM PST
by
byteback
To: Petronski
Great...primaries before the college bowl games.
To: byteback
Thanks for the info. Yes Romney is a close second to Guiliani.
10
posted on
11/21/2007 1:09:56 PM PST
by
jveritas
(God bless our brave troops and President Bush)
To: Beagle8U
Why is this bad for Mitt? He is in 2nd place in Michigan behind Rudy. Wouldn’t this be great for him?
1st in Iowa, and New Hampshire, followed by a strong 2nd place (or maybe even 1st) in Michigan?
These are all of the States that show his strength. If it is bad for anyone, it would probably be Mike Huckabee, who may have a burst from Iowa, only to be followed very closely by 2 weak States.
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2008/president/mi/michigan_republican_primary-237.html
11
posted on
11/21/2007 1:10:04 PM PST
by
codercpc
To: jveritas
OF course it is.
Everything’s good news for the Mittster. He probably paid someone to move up the primary.
12
posted on
11/21/2007 1:11:02 PM PST
by
RockinRight
(Just because you're pro-life and talk about God a lot doesn't mean you're a conservative.)
To: jveritas
In most polls Rooty and Mutt were tied here but that is beside the point.
The RAT crossover vote will deside the Republican winner and with the Republican vote so split it likely will be Ron Paul.
Its an open primary with RATS and Republicans voting the same day.
Hildabeast is the only RAT on their ballot except Gravel and Kooksinish.
RATS and Ind’s will vote on the Republican ballots and my guess is that Ron Paul will get that vote.
Romney wont win Michigan.
13
posted on
11/21/2007 1:13:04 PM PST
by
Beagle8U
(FreeRepublic -- One stop shopping ....... Its the Conservative Super WalMart for news .)
To: jveritas
It’s both good and bad news for Romney. Good, because he is tied statistically at last check and had somewhat of a favorite son status. Bad, because it probably means MI will be penalized half its delegates, from 60 to 30. MI is winner take all.
I guess it depends on if the momentum counts for more than the actual early number of delegates going in to Super Tuesday, and if he can beat out Rudy.
14
posted on
11/21/2007 1:14:11 PM PST
by
LexBaird
(Behold, thou hast drinken of the Aide of Kool, and are lost unto Men.)
To: Beagle8U
Ron Paul winning Michigan?! Get real man.
15
posted on
11/21/2007 1:14:33 PM PST
by
jveritas
(God bless our brave troops and President Bush)
To: codercpc
16
posted on
11/21/2007 1:14:50 PM PST
by
Beagle8U
(FreeRepublic -- One stop shopping ....... Its the Conservative Super WalMart for news .)
To: jveritas
You think the RATS will crossover to vote for Romney?...lol
17
posted on
11/21/2007 1:18:28 PM PST
by
Beagle8U
(FreeRepublic -- One stop shopping ....... Its the Conservative Super WalMart for news .)
To: Petronski
Would it be unconstitutional for the federal government to specifiy the earliest date possible for primaries, say, March 1, or something like that. This is just getting ridiculous. I mean, the position is at the federal level.
To: Beagle8U
How is it that Obama and Edwards are not on the Rat Michigan ballot? It’s hard to believe they missed a filing deadline.
19
posted on
11/21/2007 1:21:49 PM PST
by
hunter112
(Change will happen when very good men are forced to do very bad things.)
To: Beagle8U
Why do you think the democrats will cross over in massive number to vote for a certain Republican candidate in the primaries? Did this massive democrats voting for Republicans candidates in Michigan primaries occurred before? You can tell me that you think Romney is going to lose Michigan but do not create a silly scenario about why he is going to lose and even a sillier scenario that Ron Paul is going to win it.
20
posted on
11/21/2007 1:22:06 PM PST
by
jveritas
(God bless our brave troops and President Bush)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-64 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson