And again, I call BULLSHIT.
The woman was ordered back to the car so the cop wouldn’t have to watch his back. If she didn’t, she’d have been a liability and then he’d have to deal with her in another way. Safer for her, safer for him. The cop then explains why it went down that way, in order to calm the woman down.
I will say this is another reason that I’ve always opposed single-cop patrols. A cop needs somebody to watch his back against an asshole driver or his bitchy wife.
Ok, you just went over the line. Would you expect a cop to call your wife names like that? Would your wife just sit there and smile and say “oh officer it’s ok. Zap him once again for me?”.
You can call whatever you want. The cop ordered a potential witness to any criminal behavior to not view what he was doing. BTW, what I called witness tampering was after the man was in the police car when the cop went back and lied to the woman and to try to affect her perception of what had happened.
The cop had NO reason to even discuss the event with a potential witness. He did it because he knew he was facing potential problems. That is witness tampering and he should be charge like anyone else who tried to tamper with a witness.
You’ve posted at least 50 (60 maybe) replies on this thread (obsess much?). You could post 600 and I wouldn’t believe that smartass cop was right in what he did - and I hope he gets shitcanned asap.
The video is there. The back-tazing cop didn’t do his job correctly - he didn’t inform the driver what would happen if he didn’t sign the ticket and he opened the passenger side door (after already scaring the poor wife nearly to death earlier) without consent.
The kicker is that it was an out and out speed-trap to begin with. Typical local yocal revenue-boosting speed-trap. When the common folk don’t fall in line with the no-neck idiot cop, what happens? They get tazed.
Screw that hammerhead cop. I hope he is working at Wendys next week.