Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: PapaBear3625
"Read the article and follow the links in the order the article shows them. The Federal OSHA’s web page talks about the requirement to reduce exposure to guns"

OK. I wouldn't don't it. OSHA is intent on forcing everyone to transform into virtual candy asses anyway. Folks are required to get training for everything now, from using a pencil, to packing cardboard boxes, so it's understandable.

20 posted on 12/06/2007 10:33:58 AM PST by spunkets ("Freedom is about authority", Rudy Giuliani, gun grabber)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]


To: spunkets
Also, OSHA can stay in the background on this and avoid political heat on the Administration. By making guns a "safety violation", OSHA thereby ensures that insurance companies will do their work for them.

If there's a shooting, and there was no anti-gun policy in place, then the business is in violation of OSHA safety regulations. Being in violation would undercut their defense against any lawsuit, so of course any plaintiff's lawyer would ensure that a complaint was filed with OSHA. The insurance companies, to protect their position in such a scenario, would mandate a "no guns" policy as a condition of getting insurance

22 posted on 12/06/2007 11:39:52 AM PST by PapaBear3625
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson