“He complains that the anti war idiots are too anti Bush then in the end he complains about those evil Republicans...”
Thats what I got out of this little piece too. The writer, to me, appears confused. He is complaining that the only real purpose of those he has now detached himself was anti-anyone that disagreed with their agenda by saying:
“I think, is nothing short of the prolonged character assassination of all those who disagree with their message.”
But then makes several statements showing he is no different. He lost me with this statement altogether...
“Republicans in Congress, for the most part, would follow George W. Bush to the gates of hell.”
He has not restored his integrity but has accomplished making it more muddy.
Having met the guy, I can tell you that you are correct. Problem is that he's an angry combative guy. Angry and stupid is dangerous to others.