To: SubGeniusX
Has there been a less qualified and more ineffective press secretary in the history of the white house than Scott McClellan?
3 posted on
11/20/2007 12:22:45 PM PST by
Phantom Lord
(Fall on to your knees for the Phantom Lord)
To: Phantom Lord
4 posted on
11/20/2007 12:23:53 PM PST by
LexBaird
(Behold, thou hast drinken of the Aide of Kool, and are lost unto Men.)
To: Phantom Lord
5 posted on
11/20/2007 12:24:06 PM PST by
slapshot
(""USAF- when you absolutely, positively need it delivered on target, on time, right away)
To: Phantom Lord; SubGeniusX
Has there been a less qualified and more ineffective press secretary in the history of the white house than Scott McClellan?
No. He was always pale and soaking wet. He spoke with a shaky voice like he was about to puke. I think he did puke several times. He was a nervous wreck and the press ran all over him.
31 posted on
11/20/2007 12:49:09 PM PST by
Jaysun
(It's outlandishly inappropriate to suggest that I'm wrong.)
To: Phantom Lord
"Has there been a less qualified and more ineffective press secretary in the history of the white house than Scott McClellan?"
No. He was the absolute worst! The President and the American people were ill served by this bumbling idiot almost as badly as we were with Sec. Gonzales. I would only hope he becomes a part of Hillary's campaign but on second thought even she's not that stupid.
51 posted on
11/20/2007 1:36:46 PM PST by
Liberty Valance
(Keep a simple manner for a happy life :o)
To: Phantom Lord
I never did like this guy. He always looked like he needed a laxative.
52 posted on
11/20/2007 1:38:37 PM PST by
gramho12
To: Phantom Lord
Has there been a less qualified and more ineffective press secretary in the history of the white house than Scott McClellan? Yes...but only one.
73 posted on
11/20/2007 3:20:35 PM PST by
lepton
("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson