WHile I do not doubt Dr. Paul’s commitment to “principle,” and I actually support many of the principles he espouses — right to life, free market economy, constitutional government, etc. — when it comes to foreign policy, he has his head in the sand just as deep as Hillary, and pretty close to as much as Obama.
Paul does not recognize the inherent dangers of the virulent form of Islamofascism loose in the world today — much as those who failed to see any danger from the Nazi’s just before WW II.
Isolationism is NOT a foreign policy, and disregarding the vitriol of our enemies who call for our destruction is not “Constitutional.” On that point alone, Paul forfeits any credibility or claim to be qualified to serve as POTUS.
You need to read more about Ron Paul. Isolationism better describes the current policy. Ron Paul, by contrast, is for free trade and diplomacy.
You need to read more about Ron Paul. Isolationism better describes the current policy. Ron Paul, by contrast, is for free trade and diplomacy.