It's hard to believe that someone would ridicule everything about the man such as you just did.
There was a time when many of us were ready to rally around this man. His outpouring of books and articles are mostly on the mark and those that deny that are deluding themselves.
The only thing that pat is correct about these days is his insisteance that there is a demographic problem and that we, a nation, are not sustaining our population with higher birth rates. But his ideas about how government should get involved are always off the mark. Pat’s a statist who disdains markets. He’s a central planning type who only pays liberty lip-service as long as it helps him make a point — then he drops it (embrace of liberty) like a bad habit. He’s the nanny-state extoller within a party that is supposed to champion for limited government. Defend him if you wish but he is like the anti-Reagan these days.
Until it became painfully obvious that he is a loon. Father Coughlan without the collar. Charles Lindbergh without the plane.