Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: drpix; SmithL

I think you’re correct, drpix. I think that Roberts is taking this case because he knows the Court will rule in favor of the gun owners, and he wants that to be settled law.


305 posted on 11/21/2007 8:53:32 PM PST by Mr. Silverback (Support Scouting: Raising boys to be strong men and politically incorrect at the same time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]


To: Mr. Silverback
I think that Roberts is taking this case because he knows the Court will rule in favor of the gun owners, and he wants that to be settled law.

No he's taking it because there is a split in opinions in two separate circuits. The Supreme Coutt is more or less obligated to take the case to settle the law.

I am not optimistic. There are only four justices who give a damn about the what the framers thought about this amendment and what the original intent was. This one could go very badly for our second amendment rights.

306 posted on 11/21/2007 9:44:28 PM PST by P-Marlowe (LPFOKETT GAHCOEEP-w/o*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 305 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson