Anyone who doesn't get its meaning now isn't going to get it when worded differently.
>> Anyone who doesn’t get its meaning now isn’t going to get it when worded differently.
I respectfully disagree.
Hopefully, the justices will make a correct and helpful ruling and it won’t be an issue, anyway.
If not... I’m just offering that writing the amendment with clarity is something we CAN work towards.
How about “It is the Constitutional right of every American except registered Democrats to own any handgun, rifle, shotgun, bazooka, mortar, howitzer, field gun, etc., that they damn well please, the desires of any government entity (who are assumed to be corrupt anyway) notwithstanding.”?