Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Senators take more antitrust and privacy shots at Google
CNET ^ | November 20, 2007 | Matt Asay

Posted on 11/20/2007 8:15:13 AM PST by george76

A letter from the top two ranking members of the Senate Subcommittee on Antitrust, Competition Policy, and Consumer Rights, Democrat Herb Kohl and Republican Orrin Hatch, seeks to chill Google's proposed acquisition of DoubleClick on antitrust grounds:

Antitrust regulators need to be wary to guard against the creation of a powerful Internet conglomerate able to extend its market power in one market into adjacent markets, to the detriment of competition and consumers.

This might not have seemed like much of a threat, even a year or two ago, but as the online world increasingly merges with the offline world, the threat becomes more palpable.

My primary concern with the deal isn't about advertising market share, but rather about privacy, as the senators also call out:

DoubleClick collects an enormous quantity of information on individual Web users' preferences, and privacy advocates have expressed very serious concerns regarding the consequences of this data coming under the control of Google due to the fact that Google is the dominant Internet search engine and can also track individuals' search requests.

Therefore, we believe that this deal raises fundamental consumer privacy concerns worthy of serious scrutiny.

(Excerpt) Read more at blogs.cnet.com ...


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: antitrust; congress; corruption; doubleclick; google; hatch; internet; internetsearch; microsoft; orrinhatch; privacy; searchengine

1 posted on 11/20/2007 8:15:15 AM PST by george76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce; SunkenCiv; Myrddin

A cell phone is tied to the user’s name, address, date of birth, and phone number.

The primary goal of Android, is for Big Brother Google to harvest information for it’s Advertising Database.

by john55440


2 posted on 11/20/2007 8:16:18 AM PST by george76 (Ward Churchill : Fake Indian, Fake Scholarship, and Fake Art)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rdb3; chance33_98; Calvinist_Dark_Lord; PenguinWry; GodGunsandGuts; CyberCowboy777; Salo; Bobsat; ..

3 posted on 11/20/2007 8:18:55 AM PST by ShadowAce (Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #4 Removed by Moderator

To: george76

Don’t think much of Google, but even at their worst, they have folks far, far more intelligent than anyone in our congress. A pox on congress.


5 posted on 11/20/2007 8:35:07 AM PST by Da Coyote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george76
If he wants to put doubleclick out of business I would be all for it.
6 posted on 11/20/2007 8:35:23 AM PST by org.whodat (What's the difference between a Democrat and a republican????)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george76

This makes my brain explode. Hatch shouldn’t be allowed anywhere near anything IT related, for the survival of the 1st amendment. On the other hand, it’s very likely that Doubleclick’s fat profit margins through invasive ads will subsume Google’s non-invasive ad placement strategy if the merger goes through.


7 posted on 11/20/2007 9:14:26 AM PST by JerseyHighlander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george76

>>A cell phone is tied to the user’s name, address, date of birth, and phone number.

The primary goal of Android, is for Big Brother Google to harvest information for it’s Advertising Database.

by john55440<<

That’s true. And that’s why I don’t use any Google service that requires being logged in.

But its funny to the Senate lecturing Google on privacy after what the government has done to our privacy in the last 6 years.


8 posted on 11/20/2007 9:38:53 AM PST by gondramB (Preach the Gospel at all times, and when necessary, use words.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: JerseyHighlander
This makes my brain explode. Hatch shouldn’t be allowed anywhere near anything IT related

Let's see, so far we have him saying that copyright holders should be allowed to hack into and destroy the systems of anyone suspected of copyright infringement. He wants all tools that make copyright infringement possible to be made illegal, killing any fair use and making the media conglomerates our masters (all under the guise of "It's for the children!").

Yep, he needs to stay far away until he can be put out to pasture.

9 posted on 11/20/2007 9:55:38 AM PST by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson