Yours is the sort of opportunistic bashing that gives Hunter (supporters) a bad name. Knock it off. The thread is about FDT’s numbers (in one poll) in NH; Hunter is not mentioned. (And there’s a reason why he’s not mentioned.)
Yours is the sort of opportunistic bashing that gives Hunter (supporters) a bad name.
***And Fred’s followers are getting more shrill, it’s a sign of fear.
Knock it off.
***I’ve only been logging onto the the following:
1) immigration threads — because Hunter criticized Thompson on immigration
Road to Des Moines Conversions on Immigration (Hunter Press release)
News Which Cannot Lose ^ | 10/25/07 | Duncan Hunter/staff
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/1916889/posts
2) Hunter losing traciton in polls threads
3) Prolife threads, where I barely even criticize Thompson because he has a prolife record
4) A few other scattered threads.
The thread is about FDT’s numbers (in one poll) in NH;
***Then it is one of the threads I intend to log onto and show how Fred is not a good campaigner. The data at Intrade shows it.
Thompson’s campaign is showing signs of imploding.
Who would be the unbiased indicator for that, Fred Supporters or Futures Markets? If you have better unbiased data, let me see it.
.
.
Why the smart money is on Duncan Hunter
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1926032/posts
Posted on 11/15/2007 3:43:17 AM PST by Kevmo
So why is Ron Paul in the poll? This does smell funny. Why the spike in people who would not support Thompson even if their candidate dropped out? It smells like a push poll.
Never mind, I just read coderpc’s post #49. I forgot about the debate. New Hampshire cherishes its status as the first primary. That explains a lot.