Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jdm
No way could Fred Thompson's negatives be this high. He just didn't do anything that controversial during his eight years in the senate. He certainly hasn't said anything very controversial since he started running.

They may be polling a lot of Ron Paul moonbats posing as Libertarians or Conservative Republicans, but those negatives should show up against all candidates, not just Fred Thompson.

13 posted on 11/19/2007 4:38:19 PM PST by Vigilanteman (Are there any men left in Washington? Or are there only cowards? Ahmad Shah Massoud)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Vigilanteman

The problem is that the question is really 3 questions.

Would you vote for.

Would you not vote for.

Would you not vote for under any circumstance.


175 posted on 11/19/2007 7:23:56 PM PST by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain. True Supporters of the Troops will pray for US to Win!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: Vigilanteman

*****They may be polling a lot of Ron Paul moonbats posing as Libertarians or Conservative Republicans, but those negatives should show up against all candidates, not just Fred Thompson.******

Hey, Ron Paul doesn’t have that many supporters. They are just a few people living in the basement spamming polls.

“The only thing worse than people talking about you is people not talking about you.”

I am happy that Ron Paul is one of the top 5 people mentioned in the poll, even if his numbers look bad


212 posted on 11/20/2007 2:15:44 AM PST by jmeagan (Our last chance to change the direction of the country -- Ron Paul)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson