Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: mamelukesabre

I suspect (and its a smart move economically) he doesn’t want to loose listeners (He fully; and smartly) knows that once he endorses someone then the rest of the Republican field will (most supporters of other candidates) will be put off, and then they will call in ask why/argue with him, and that will be the focus of the show, not defeating liberalism and (Rush’s Agenda).


144 posted on 11/19/2007 8:37:32 PM PST by JSDude1 (When a liberal represents the Presidential Nominee for the Republicans; THEY'RE TOAST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies ]


To: JSDude1

Unless I’ve missed something, I haven’t heard Rush mention any of the Rep. candidates. He mentions Hillary and Obama and Edwards quite a bit, though.


155 posted on 11/19/2007 9:20:27 PM PST by murron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies ]

To: JSDude1

I don’t think that is correct. Rush is richer than he’ll ever need to be. He doesn’t have to work anymore.

Besides...It would be way to easy for rush to denounce rudy or romney. There is no argument in the world for rudy or romney that would hold up against rush’s analysis. It’s just too easy. They are NOT conservatives. They are liars. They are democrats in republican clothes.

We all heard rush say he was tired of carrying water for the bush administration. Well, carrying water for a romney or rudy administration would be way more tiring than that!


177 posted on 11/20/2007 5:30:57 AM PST by mamelukesabre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson