To: drpix
Doesn't sound like "...nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property..." My original point was that (1) the federal government has a responsibility to ensure the states don't deprive any person of life, liberty or property and (2) they are not doing a very good job of it.
155 posted on
11/20/2007 4:19:34 AM PST by
wideawake
(Why is it that so many self-proclaimed "Constitutionalists" know so little about the Constitution?)
To: wideawake
My point has been not to overreach. Go for the most electable Candidate that will make SCOTUS appointment s who will overturn Roe v. Wade. The Constitutionality question is very muddy water and the Amendment process at this time is a bridge too far. (But thanks for the info on estate planning... it gives me something to think about personally.)
156 posted on
11/20/2007 4:26:25 AM PST by
drpix
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson