Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: drpix
Doesn't sound like "...nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property..."

My original point was that (1) the federal government has a responsibility to ensure the states don't deprive any person of life, liberty or property and (2) they are not doing a very good job of it.

155 posted on 11/20/2007 4:19:34 AM PST by wideawake (Why is it that so many self-proclaimed "Constitutionalists" know so little about the Constitution?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies ]


To: wideawake
My point has been not to overreach. Go for the most electable Candidate that will make SCOTUS appointment s who will overturn Roe v. Wade. The Constitutionality question is very muddy water and the Amendment process at this time is a bridge too far. (But thanks for the info on estate planning... it gives me something to think about personally.)
156 posted on 11/20/2007 4:26:25 AM PST by drpix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson