To: drpix
what would be the case if it was a simple will... would the child, unborn at the time of the final division of property, be considered a beneficiary?Usually, yes - if the child proves to be a natural child of the decedent.
139 posted on
11/19/2007 10:19:32 AM PST by
wideawake
(Why is it that so many self-proclaimed "Constitutionalists" know so little about the Constitution?)
To: wideawake
... nor "Usually" shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property...? Doesn't sound like "...nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property..."
148 posted on
11/19/2007 2:40:13 PM PST by
drpix
To: wideawake
For a different spin on the usual abortion question...How would state courts view the woman being artificially inseminated with a sperm bank deposit of the decease - the day before the the property will be divided? And how and when should federal courts get involved in this when does life begin test?
149 posted on
11/19/2007 2:58:25 PM PST by
drpix
To: wideawake
CORRECTION: decease = deceased
150 posted on
11/19/2007 2:59:40 PM PST by
drpix
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson