Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: drpix
All these angles in Probate and Trust laws are non-federal and differ substantially from state to state as to who can get property at the time of death.

Indeed. But the unborn beneficiaries of the will still get their day in probabte court - thus their property rights are subjected to due process.

State law also trumps federal law in how the comatose and retarded are treated - as we saw in the Schiavo tragedy.

Again, the presumption was that Terry Schiavo had rights and those rights could not be infringed without the due process of law.

The unlikeliness of a new Amendment passing all the states required would make it a shame to divert energy from overturning Roe v. Wade NOW THAT IT IS WITHIN GRASP.

Of course Roe v. Wade should be overturned at the earliest opportunity.

114 posted on 11/19/2007 8:38:28 AM PST by wideawake (Why is it that so many self-proclaimed "Constitutionalists" know so little about the Constitution?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies ]


To: wideawake; All
I'm not a lawyer, but my bet is that if a state inheritance law past, present or future limited the beneficiaries of a will to living persons, federal courts would not become involved.

Is anyone aware of any instance of federal law or courts becoming involved in this state issue?

117 posted on 11/19/2007 9:06:00 AM PST by drpix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson