Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: napscoordinator
As a person who has already paid SS for 30 years, and is planning on paying it for another 20 years, I think your idea of increasing my time/cost just sucks. That’s OK though because it’s been at least a decade since I realized that My SS payments were never coming back to me. I just plan on retiring without SS while I watch my Union friends retire at 45-55 years old and start their second careers.
21 posted on 11/19/2007 3:04:40 AM PST by Woodman ("One of the most striking differences between a cat and a lie is that a cat has only nine lives." PW)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]


To: Woodman

It looks to me like you will have the quarters and almost do already. 30 years equals 120 quarters which is what you qualify for. Now the only problem could be age. I don’t know of any other way to do it that would satisfy everyone. The senate won’t just do away with the entire program and seniors can barely live on the check they get anyway. It does not seem like a win-win situation anyway.


23 posted on 11/19/2007 3:19:51 AM PST by napscoordinator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson