Really? The evidence is there if you care to find it. Heck, even if you've just been paying attention.
And I suppose even his 100% pro-life voting record doesn't clue you in, eh?
And I suppose Romney is a pillar of integrity when it comes to the abortion issue? You're duplicity on this is staggering to behold.
You're really stretching all bounds of credibility Spiff. Try as you might, you cannot make FT a pro abortion candidate.
Really? Show me. Also show me a single pro-life speech he ever made on the Senate floor. Or a pro-life bill for which he was the primary sponsor.
And I suppose even his 100% pro-life voting record doesn't clue you in, eh?
He doesn't have a 100% pro-life voting record. His Senate scorecards from the National Right to Life Committee were 87%, 78% and 33%. He was one of the primary architects and supporters of the biggest threat and harm to the pro-life cause in decades. He even opposed the NRLC at the Supreme Court on this issue. He highlighted his own Senate votes for Title X "family planning" taxpayer funding in a candidate questionnaire for a pro-abort group. Such Title X funding is the primary source of taxpayer funding for Planned Parenthood. He doesn't have a 100% pro-life voting record.
You're really stretching all bounds of credibility Spiff. Try as you might, you cannot make FT a pro abortion candidate.
I've never tried to make Fred Thompson a pro-abortion candidate. I've only pointed out that his record isn't 100% pro-life and that some of what he is saying isn't congruous with the traditional goals of the pro-life movement.