Keep this close as well:
CNN Pre-Plann(T)ed & Censored Every Question & Questioner at Dem Debate(?)!
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1927189/posts
BTW, our marine who’s name was different on screen (not the only one), has been to protests at Reps. Porter and Heller, Reid and Pelosi’s offices... as well as some other event sponsored by Americans Against Escalation in Iraq. You already know mom’s been to protests and on TV. I still smell Rieckoff though.
FYI, democratic blogspot 919 will flip you away from the info on Spencer to an ebay page... that’s happened for four different sites now... and the caches. Look like I missed the cleanup time.
I want to know if Lashannon Spencer still lives in Arkansas... seems a long way for an ‘undecided’ (cough) voter to travel. I wonder if it stung her to have her question added to as well:
“We constantly hear health care questions, and questions pertaining to the war. But we don’t hear questions pertaining to the Supreme Court justice or education. My question is, if you are elected president, what qualities must the appointee possess?”
To which was added:
Malveaux directed the question to Senator Christopher Dodd, and added whether or not he would “require nominees to support abortion rights.”
After:
Dodd answered Spencers question, as well as Malveauxs addition. “I don’t necessarily believe in applying litmus tests here. I think that’s a dangerous precedent to begin that process here. You start down that path, others may follow it, you end up with a court then that may lack that kind of balance.”
Debate moderator Wolf Blitzer then directed the attention to Delaware Senator Joe Biden. “Would you insist that any nominee for the U.S. Supreme Court supported abortion rights for women?” Biden surprisingly took issue with Malveauxs addition. “Suzanne’s decided. I’m not answering her question. I’m answering the question of the woman who was there, okay?” This reply also drew some applause from the audience. Blitzer then asked Spencer if she wanted Biden to answer Malveauxs addition as well as her own question. Spencer repled that she wanted “both questions” answered. Biden then put his answer in the context of the so-called right to privacy.
Did Suzanne enjoy her question being pigeonholed to just abortion stance court requirements?
Good information thanks.
And a great link!