Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: justiceseeker93
What really tees me off is that the national media were more "dispassionate" and "independent" and honest during my own lifetime, and I've seen them morph into cheerleaders for the destruction of America before my very eyes.

Don't be so sure.

I clearly recall the sainted Walter Cronkite blowing smoke up my ass about Tet in 1968 -- though I didn't realize it at the time.

My view is a.) they've always been partisan, b.) which didn't become apparent until the Viet Nam War and now c.) they've thrown all pretense of being "independent" and "dispassionate" to the wind, becoming outright cheerleaders for the liberal cause.

Sadly, it wasn't until talk radio or the internet that we began to have our suspicions confirmed...

35 posted on 11/18/2007 4:34:39 PM PST by okie01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]


To: okie01

What I was thinking about even more than network TV news was the old newspaper, which separated news (dispassionate, interest in conveying objective facts) from opinion, which was placed on segregated op-ed pages. Of course, many of the MSM newspapers in those days were acually owned by entrepreneurial individuals and families, and quite a few major ones were unabashedly conservative and Republican on their editorial pages. With the contraction of the newspaper industry and the shifts in ownership of the newspapers that now survive, there is very little diversity in either news coverage or opinion in the major metro dailies, and it is rare to see a story that is “dispassionate,” “independent,” and objective.


36 posted on 11/18/2007 5:59:37 PM PST by justiceseeker93
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson