Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: kalee

I’ll repeat this AGAIN for people who don’t know. This is the SAME trick they pull in the 1990s that GAVE US “boxers or briefs”.

The girl who asked the B or B question was the daughter of a journalist. She’d already been vetted by the Clinton campaign. I think that the forum was Viacom-MTV and that her mom worked for Viacom-CBS News.

At any rate, she and her mother discussed “important” questions and settled on one about the legalization of recreational drugs. The Clinton campaign nixed that and had her ask something light, ergo the Boxer or Briefs question.

Same crap, different day.


30 posted on 11/17/2007 9:06:30 AM PST by weegee (NO THIRD TERM. America does not need another unconstitutional Clinton co-presidency.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]


To: weegee
The Clinton campaign nixed that and had her ask something light, ergo the Boxer or Briefs question.

How ironic that they centered around his pEnI$.

53 posted on 11/17/2007 9:33:25 AM PST by Yaelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

To: weegee

I think people have to come to the conclusion that what they see on tv news, including debates, etc., are not just tilted or bias, but often complete whole-cloth fabrications.

For many people the level of absolute distrust and cynicism is difficult to acquire, but it is the only way to view our media and have a chance of seeing through them.


187 posted on 11/18/2007 6:54:43 PM PST by WoofDog123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson