Sorry, I was providing that information in an attempt to forestall any claims from the tinfoil brigade that an errant Tomahawk flying at 13,000 feet could have easily downed the 747. I've read enough of your posts on this thread to know that you're not a caught up in all the wacko conspiracies that so many others have fallen for.
No need to be. I should have been a little clearer on what I had typed.
“I was providing that information in an attempt to forestall any claims from the tinfoil brigade that an errant Tomahawk flying at 13,000 feet could have easily downed the 747. I’ve read enough of your posts on this thread to know that you’re not a caught up in all the wacko conspiracies that so many others have fallen for.”
Yeah, I know.
IF it were a missile it definitely wasn’t one of ours.
I’m actually starting to lean towards a possible bomb though because wasn’t this supposedly around the same time frame that AQ and ramzi yousef was working on that bojinka plot?
Hell it could have also been some sort of HAZMAT in the cargo hold like in that Valuejet crash in Miami for all we know.
But I do not buy the whole exploding fuel tank thing, at least not in the way the government claims. I don’t buy that there are unshielded bundles of wires that run through the fuel tanks instead of through conduits. Or the claim that it’s because the plane sat on the tarmac with the AC on for however long.
If that were the case, wouldn’t there be more of these planes going KABOOM during the summer months?
I also don’t buy the 3200 foot “death climb” either because in the case of PanAm flight 103 it didn’t happen AFIK.