Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: CharlesWayneCT
BTW, just to be clear, not pushing HLA because it won’t pass is a rational compromise. Publicly opposing it because you think violating the rights of pre-born children is a “states rights” issue is not, it’s agreeing with the enemy. So I don’t think Fred is compromising there, he is wrong.

The former is Thompson's position, not the latter. That's one of the factors that went into the NRLC endorsement, according to articles in the last few days.

80 posted on 11/16/2007 12:35:24 PM PST by kevkrom ("Should government be doing this? And if so, then at what level of government?" - FDT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies ]


To: kevkrom

I agree with you on Fred’s position, and I speculate that the clarification issued on the subjet by his campaign was in part related to the NRLC endorsement, maybe a phone call saying “we can’t endorse you if you are saying you will oppose the platform plank on HLA (which is what he actually SAID on MTP, that he OPPOSED the plank), so his campaign came back and said he would NOT oppose it.


87 posted on 11/16/2007 12:43:36 PM PST by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson