You really need to get out more, then:
http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3298371,00.html
The tired old "well, another Jew said it, so nyaahh nyaahh" wheeze is unfailingly the dead giveaway that its speaker is roughly as kosher knowledgeable (or, for that matter, kosher friendly), themselves, as a bag of pork rinds; and, therefore, talking out of their @ss.
Again: you're profoundly out of your depth on this one, plain and simple. "Read More About It," as the saying goes... and then get back to me.
I gave you documented proof that the ADL has spied on Americans, and it at least one case were sued successfully in court for defamation. You responded by changing the subject and attacking the New York Times. Here's a clue - the NYT didn't invent the court records. You're still ignoring the facts. Changing the subject and attacking the messenger won't help.
The tired old "well, another Jew said it, so nyaahh nyaahh" wheeze is unfailingly the dead giveaway that its speaker is roughly as kosher knowledgeable (or, for that matter, kosher friendly), themselves, as a bag of pork rinds; and, therefore, talking out of their @ss.
And now the anti-Semite card is flashed along with a personal attack, which is the unfailingly dead giveaway that its speaker has lost the debate. I never said "another Jew said it" so please don't lie about what I wrote.
Again: you're profoundly out of your depth on this one, plain and simple.
LOL, you can't deal with the subject without trying to change it. I gave you documented proof that the ADL has been sued in court for defaming US citizens, and you responded by attacking the messenger.
"Read More About It," as the saying goes... and then get back to me. Nah, you can get back to me. You'll have to do your own homework.
Here's another one from 2003 from the Jewish World Weekly (more self hating Jews I'll bet): ADL will continue to fight $9.7 million jury award
You lose.